What the work
actually teaches.

Ninety per cent of it is approach, not capability

Companies arrive in Riyadh convinced the hard part is the product. It almost never is. The technical work that got you here is the part that already works.

What decides the outcome is how you enter. Who introduces you, in what order, with what framing, and whether the person across the table has any reason to take your call a second time. I have watched genuinely excellent companies stall for a year on this, and ordinary ones move quickly because somebody senior vouched for them in the first month.

This is not a complaint about the market. It is how relationship-led markets work everywhere, and it is more honest here than in most. The mistake is treating it as an afterthought, something the local hire will handle once the entity is registered. By then you have already spent the introductions you did not know you were spending.

Back to the list

Trust arrives before the contract, not after it

In a lot of markets the contract creates the relationship. Here the relationship creates the contract, and if you try it the other way round you will spend six months wondering why a signed agreement produced nothing.

That has a practical consequence for sequencing. The introductions have to happen before there is anything to sell, which means before there is a reason for anybody to make them. This is why networks built in the month you need them are so visible. Everybody can tell.

The uncomfortable version of this: if you are arriving now and you need a relationship that takes years, you cannot build it. You have to borrow one, and be honest with yourself about what you are borrowing and what it costs the person lending it.

Back to the list

Your activity codes are the whole licence

The single most expensive administrative mistake I see is a licence issued against activity codes that do not cover what the business actually intends to do.

It looks like a formality at the application stage. It is not. The codes determine what you may invoice for, what you may hire against, and what a bank will let you do. Getting them wrong is not a correction, it is an amendment, and amendments cost both time and money at exactly the moment you have neither.

Spend the extra week before filing. Write down every revenue line you expect in the first three years, including the ones you think are unlikely, and check each one against the codes you are applying for. Then have a licensed advisor check it again.

Licensing rules move. This reflects what I see as at September 2026, and it is a description of how the process behaves rather than regulatory advice. The filing itself belongs with licensed advisors.

Back to the list

The capital-versus-traction paradox

Investors want traction in the Kingdom before they fund the entry. The entry is what produces the traction. Founders get stuck in that loop for a year and blame themselves.

The way out is not a bigger raise. It is finding the smallest credible presence that generates real signal: one pilot, one named reference, one meeting with a buyer who has a budget. That is usually achievable for a fraction of what a full entry costs, and it changes the conversation with investors completely.

What does not work is a launch. A hard launch in a market where nobody knows you spends your entire budget on an announcement that the people who matter did not attend.

Back to the list

Budget eighteen months for an enterprise sale, and mean it

Selling into the large Saudi corporates and the semi-government entities runs eighteen months to two years from first meeting to first invoice. The fast ones almost always had a relationship in place before the clock started.

That length is a function of contract size and diligence rather than anything peculiar to the market. These are large, long commitments and they get examined properly, which is exactly what you would want if you were the one signing. Founders who have previously sold to enterprises in Europe or the United States tend to recognise the pattern once they see it.

The problem is that founders routinely model six months, raise against that model, and run out of runway in month nine with three deals at the procurement stage and nothing banked. The deals were real. The timeline was not.

If your model cannot survive an eighteen-month cycle, either find a mid-market segment that closes faster and fund the enterprise push from that revenue, or do not start. Both are respectable. Discovering it in month nine is not.

Back to the list

Hire two or three young Saudis and put an experienced operator over them

The instinct on arrival is to hire one very senior local person and let them run everything. It is expensive, it concentrates all your risk in one relationship, and if it does not work you are eighteen months behind.

What I have seen work better: two or three ambitious young Saudi hires, trained properly and given real responsibility early, with one experienced operator above them who has run this particular function before. The young hires learn the business from the inside, they build with you rather than arriving with someone else's habits, and the experienced person supplies the specific technical judgement that only comes from having done it.

If you have an established operation elsewhere in the group, second them into it for a few months first. Seeing a mature version of the process at close range is worth a year of documentation, and they come back with opinions about how it should be adapted here, which is the part you actually want.

Back to the list

September to March is the season. The rest is preparation

The Saudi business year has a rhythm and it is not evenly distributed. The densest stretch runs September to March. Decisions get made, budgets get spent, the conference calendar fills, and people are in the country and in the mood to meet.

The summer is quieter for the ordinary reason that families travel, much as August empties Paris and Milan. Ramadan has its own rhythm rather than a slower one: the working day shifts, and the evenings become one of the best relationship-building seasons in the year, if you are invited and you understand what you have been invited to. Plan for it rather than around it.

So use the quieter weeks for what they are good for. Build the material, warm the introductions, get the licence right, hire. Arrive at September with everything ready rather than spending September getting ready.

Back to the list

Compounds do not fail on fabric. They fail on feeling

I have walked a lot of compounds where the specification is genuinely good and the occupancy is not. The finishes are fine. The gym has the right equipment. The pool is clean. And three or four out of every ten people who visit decide to live there.

What is missing is harder to put in a specification. It is whether the place feels like anywhere in particular. Too many compounds are assembled from the same catalogue and could be dropped into any city on earth without anybody noticing. A family choosing between four of them is not comparing fabric, because the fabric is the same. They are choosing the one that felt like somewhere.

Local materials, local scents, local sound, food that belongs to the place, and a reception that behaves like a host rather than a security desk. None of it is expensive relative to what a point of occupancy is worth.

Back to the list

Product, community, messenger. You need all three

A residential community needs three things and they only work together. The product, which is the building and what is in it. The community, which is the people and what happens between them. And the messenger, which is whoever carries the message that makes the second thing happen.

Most developers build the first, hope for the second and never appoint the third. So the calendar is empty, the residents stay indoors, and the community that was in the brochure does not appear.

Think about any village that works. The square is not what makes it a village. Somebody convenes people in the square, week after week, and that habit is what turns a set of houses into somewhere people belong. Every residential community that works has a person doing exactly that job, and they are almost never on the org chart when I arrive.

Back to the list

Residents socialise indoors until somebody gives them a reason not to

Walk most compounds at seven in the evening and the shared spaces are empty. Not because the residents are unfriendly, but because nothing is happening and nobody wants to be the first person sitting alone by a pool.

The fix is not more amenity. It is a calendar. Something on it most weeks, at a time that suits the working week here rather than one imported from somewhere else, and somebody whose actual job is to fill it.

The commercial case is straightforward. A resident with three friends inside the gate renews. A resident who knows nobody compares prices. That is the whole argument, and it costs less than one month of vacancy.

Back to the list

A turnaround takes twelve months. Anybody promising ninety days is selling

Taking over an underperforming residential asset and making it work properly takes about a year. Not because the problems are complicated, but because the fix is training and system calibration, and both of those run at the speed people learn.

You can move occupancy faster than that with pricing. It is not a turnaround, it is a discount, and you will hold the discount for as long as you hold the asset.

What you can do in ninety days is diagnose honestly, stop the things that are actively costing you residents, and put the calendar and the messenger in place. Those buy you the twelve months.

Back to the list

One year is the market. Ask for one month and expect a no

Annual leases are the norm in Riyadh compounds, with six months sometimes available and one or three months usually refused outright. Payment is commonly split into two instalments, occasionally four.

This surprises people arriving from markets where flexible terms are standard, and it is the single most common cause of a first-month scramble. If your assignment is genuinely short or genuinely uncertain, say so at the start and look at serviced apartments instead. Trying to negotiate a compound down to a three-month term mostly costs you the compound.

Terms vary by operator and they move. Confirm what applies before you commit to anything.

Back to the list

The compound decision is a commute decision in a lifestyle costume

Every family arrives with a list about pools, gyms and how the villa feels. Almost nobody arrives with a list about the drive to school at half past seven in the morning, and the second list is the one they will live with.

A place that looks twelve minutes from the school on a map can be thirty-five in the morning. Five days a week, both ways, for three years. That is roughly two hundred hours a year in a car, and it is taken from the same evenings and weekends the family moved here to spend together. People rarely connect the two, so the complaint comes out as a vague sense that the posting is not working.

This is the one thing that genuinely cannot be judged from abroad, and it is the reason we measure drive times between every compound and every school and workplace that matters rather than estimating them. Amenity differences between good compounds are small. Commute differences are not.

Back to the list

The week that decides a move belongs to the spouse

Relocation gets sold to the person who signed the contract. They have an office to go to on the first Sunday, colleagues, a reason to be somewhere. The move is, for them, mostly logistics.

The person who gave up a career to come has none of that. An unfamiliar flat, a phone that does not ring, and a working week that now runs Sunday to Thursday. Two weeks of that decides how the next three years go, and it appears on nobody's relocation checklist.

So we plan for it explicitly. Introductions before arrival rather than after. Something in the diary in week one. A compound where there are actually other people, which is not the same as a compound with good facilities. The families that stay are the ones where the second adult had somewhere to be by the end of the first fortnight.

Back to the list

Culture shock is not a problem to solve. It is a choice to make

Everybody gets it. The language, the heat, the week starting on the wrong day, the sense that the rules are legible to everybody but you. That part is not optional and it is not a sign anything has gone wrong.

What is optional is what happens next. Some people spend three years inside the compound and the international school, meet almost nobody local, and leave saying the country was hard. Others go to the souk, accept the invitation, sit through the long conversation that does not appear to be about anything, and end up with friendships that outlast the posting.

The second group is not braver. They just decided earlier. I would say make the decision consciously in the first month, because the default is the first group and the default is quite comfortable.

Back to the list

Saudi hospitality is slow on purpose

The first few gatherings can read as reserved if you are used to a business culture that gets to the point. There is tea, there are dates, there is a lot of conversation that is not obviously about anything, and nobody raises the reason you are there.

That is not a preamble to the meeting. It is the meeting. What is being established is whether you are somebody worth knowing, and the answer to that is not in your deck.

The practical advice is dull and it works: arrive without a deadline, do not steer, and let the subject come to you. People who push through the hospitality to get to the agenda are read exactly the way you would expect, and they rarely get the second invitation.

Back to the list

With schools, the constraint is rarely the school. It is the bus

Families choose a school on curriculum and then discover the real constraint is whether a bus route reaches where they want to live, and whether the compound will let it through the gate.

Routes are built around where the existing families already are. A school that is a perfectly sensible choice on paper can be an hour of driving twice a day because your compound sits outside the pattern, and the pattern is not published anywhere.

So work the two decisions together rather than in sequence. Shortlist schools, then check which compounds are actually served, then choose. Doing it the other way round is how people end up doing the school run themselves for three years, which is a real cost that never appears in the package negotiation.

Back to the list

We say no often. Selectivity is the product

We turn down work most weeks. Sometimes because the timing is wrong, sometimes because somebody else is genuinely better placed, and sometimes because the thing being asked for is not the thing that would help.

This is not restraint for its own sake. A practice that takes everything is a practice with no opinion, and an advisor with no opinion is just an expensive pair of hands. The value of a shortlist comes entirely from what is missing off it.

It also means a first call can end with us saying we are not the right answer. That happens often enough that you should expect it rather than be surprised by it.

Back to the list

A first call is not free consulting

The first conversation is thirty minutes and it costs nothing, and its purpose is to work out whether there is a piece of work here and whether we are the right people for it. That is a real service and we take it seriously.

What it is not is the work. There is a particular kind of enquiry that arrives with a detailed brief and a request for a detailed answer, at no charge, described as a chat. We are direct about that now, earlier than we used to be, and everybody is better off for it.

Engagements are scoped, priced as a fixed fee against a written plan, and stated before anything begins. Third-party fees are always separate and always visible.

Back to the list

Call. Do not message

A thing that takes newcomers about six months to learn and costs them real time in the meantime: here, you ring people.

A message sits. It gets read, it gets meant-to-be-answered, and it quietly dies in a list of things somebody intended to get to. A call takes ninety seconds and the matter is either resolved or it is not. This is not a generational difference or an inefficiency, it is a preference for dealing with a person rather than a queue, and once you adapt to it you will find you prefer it too.

The corollary is that being reachable matters more than being organised. The advisor who picks up is worth more than the advisor with the better system.

Back to the list